Peter J. Boettke: “With Keynesian Yellen At Fed, Expect More Of The Same” – Investor’s Business Daily

Posted on :Oct 31, 2013

By: Peter J. Boettke

Investor’s Business Daily

October 30, 2013

Janet Yellen, President Obama’s selection for chair of the Federal Reserve  Bank, will likely sail through the confirmation process. Many Americans expect  the high-profile economist to achieve greater financial stability and improve  national prosperity.

But the likely outcome is more of the same policies that have made the U.S. a  virtually bankrupt nation.

The Treasury Department estimates our current debt at $16 trillion but by  Laurence Kotlikoff’s intergenerational accounting figures the fiscal gap is  somewhere around $222 trillion. That massive debt and all it entails is the  result of ideas shared by Yellen, a Keynesian economist.

In “The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money,” John Maynard  Keynes broke with the mainline tradition of economics that runs from Adam Smith  and David Hume to F.A. Hayek and modern political economists such as James  Buchanan.

Keynes argued that capitalist economies were not self-regulating and instead  were prone to suffer through bouts of economic instability. In his view,  policymakers could engage in countermeasures to fix the problem.

Keynesian ideas were particularly attractive during the 1930s as the world  economies suffered through the Great Depression. Keynes combined the greatest  fear of the advanced capitalist system — mass unemployment — with the greatest  resentment — the idle rich — and argued that one followed from the other. His  remedy was seductively simple.

Governments should deploy fiscal and monetary policy to manage economic  affairs. This launched the cycle of deficit financing, accumulated public debt  and the debasement of the currency in an effort to reduce the debt burden.

Adam Smith called this type of policy a “juggling trick” and generations of  graduate students have been trained in it. Janet Yellen is one of them.

Dr. Yellen boasts a distinguished career in academia and public policy, but  in many ways she is the quintessential government economist. She wholeheartedly  believes that a capitalist economy left alone will not tend to maintain full  employment levels of output.

Further, she believes that policymakers can optimally intervene to fix the  problems with the capitalist economy.

That runs up against a problem F.A. Hayek noted in his 1974 Nobel Prize  lecture. Such macroeconomic demand management and fine-tuning require a level of  knowledge beyond the cognitive capacity of even the most sincere and brilliant  economic administrators.

Governmental policy in the economy should follow the rule of law so that a  stable and predictable framework can be established. Individual economic actors  can decide the best strategies for coping with the uncertainty of economic life  based on their own knowledge and experiences.


Visit Us On FacebookVisit Us On TwitterVisit Us On Google Plus